Posts Tagged self defense
Tactical Flashlights In Combat
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense, Technology on October 15th, 2009
In a previous post, I discussed why a tactical flashlight is a good choice for an all-around flashlight. In this post, I’ll discuss the specific use of a flashlight in combat.
The first use of a tactical flashlight in combat is simply to provide illumination. Many self-defense situations occur at night, and if you can’t see something, you can’t respond to it. This application is fairly obvious.
The second use of a tactical flashlight in combat is to blind and disorient an opponent. Tactical flashlights are designed to be powerful enough to consistently blind a person whose eyes are adjusted to darkness at the short distances where self-defense situations often occur. Depending on the specifics of the situation, the burst of light may cause the person to see spots even after the flashlight is no longer applied. This use of the flashlight has the additional advantage of being completely non-lethal. Frankly, you can’t even be charged with a crime for flashing someone in the eyes, as you might be with other less-lethal defense tools like mace or a stun gun.
Finally, tactical flashlights can be used as direct hand-to-hand weapons. When held in the fist, similar to the old “roll of pennies,” they increase the effect of punches. Although the flashlight doesn’t add much weight to the fist, even a light-weight cylindrical object increases the effect of the punch by causing the fist to be more rigid and deform less on contact. Additionally, some flashlights have what’s called a “strike bezel,” in which the bezel of the flashlight has a scalloped edge. This presents some edges to concentrate the force if a person is struck by the bezel itself.
Of the three uses, I find the second one to be the most interesting and the least obvious. At first, a flash in the eyes from a bright light might not sound like much of a combat advantage, but the effect should not be underestimated. When the flash is unexpected, it can stall an aggressor. The blinding effect further degrades the aggressor’s ability to act effectively. A flashlight, by itself, will probably not end a fight, but it can provide just enough of an advantage, just enough of a window of response to do something else, like subdue the person with hand-to-hand techniques, or make a run for it.
The real beauty of a tactical flashlight is its fundamental innocuousness. In a dark environment, nobody will even think twice about a person carrying a flashlight. You won’t draw attention from the cops like you might with some other weapon, and flashlights are legal to carry pretty much everywhere. While rangering at Alchemy this year, I regularly had my flashlight in my hand during interactions with un-ticketed people who I was ejecting from the event. I doubt that it drew much suspicion. It’s night-time! Of course you’ve got a flashlight! Because relatively few people are aware of tactical flashlights, I was probably the only one who knew that the flashlight was one defensive option if a situation turned violent.
And let’s not forget that, unlike some single-purpose defensive tools like guns, a flashlight is useful all the other 99.9% of the time when you’re not defending yourself.
Advantages of Tactical Flashlights
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense, Technology on October 14th, 2009
A tactical flashlight is one that has been designed for combat and self-defense use. To those who are unfamiliar with the concept, this might at first sound silly. Flashlights are for light, not fighting, right? But anybody who’s fought in the dark knows that illumination is important, and more fundamentally, so does anybody who’s fumbled around in the dark for their keys. Tactical flashlights make excellent day-to-day flashlights in addition to their combat utility.
Tactical flashlights have several useful features.
They are extremely bright. In combat, this means that they can blind and disorient people and animals. In day-to-day use, this means that they’re useful at distances where an ordinary flashlight would falter. For example, at Alchemy this year, I was working the perimeter for the main burn pageant. One of the other perimeter rangers noticed a participant walk off towards the trees in such a way that he could have wandered around the side of the perimeter line. He was about 50 yards away, and it was night time, so he was difficult to pick out from the trees. My flashlight was bright enough that, even at that distance, we could easily see that he was just taking a leak. In another case, I saw at a distance of about 20 yards what looked like the silhouette of a rifle in a participant’s hand. I was sure that it wasn’t actually a rifle, but I felt obligated to investigate further. Instead of running after the participant, yelling, or otherwise exerting myself and creating a disturbance, I lit him up the lower half of his body with my flashlight. This gave me a better look at the thing in his hand and also caused him to notice me and walk my direction. As he got closer, he explained that his very-real-looking firearm was actually a BB-gun loaded with glow-in-the-dark, biodegradable BB’s. They looked awesome! Finally, the extremely bright beam of the light was usable as a headlight on a golf cart at night, where a normal flashlight might not have had enough throw to allow us to drive at a convenient speed.
They are small, especially considering the brightness of their beams. Most of them are under six inches long and weigh less than eight ounces. This makes them more convenient to hold for longer periods of time and makes it more likely that you’ll be carrying it with you when you want it.
Finally, they are extremely rugged and difficult to break. Because they are designed for combat, they are often strong enough that you could hold them in your fist and hit a person with the lens end. This means you’re unlikely to break one by dropping it.
In the interest of fairness, I should point out some down-sides of tactical flashlights. The primary one is that they are expensive. They typically run from about $150 to about $300. Hey, a 6-ounce tube that can throw a 170-lumen beam and survive being run over by a car doesn’t come cheap.
Adding to the expense are the batteries. They usually run on CR123 camera batteries, which are more expensive than regular alkalines. A typical run-time is 90 minutes, so you can spend a lot on batteries if you use your flashlight regularly. Many flashlights mitigate this factor by offering a high-intensity beam for combat and a low-intensity beam for day-to-day use. Alternatively, some of them have built-in rechargeable batteries, which saves cost, but eliminates the possibility of quickly changing out a set of dead batteries in order to continue using the light in the field. A final option might be to buy rechargeable CR123 batteries. Unfortunately, these flashlights are usually designed to maximize the light output from a pair of regular CR123s, and many of them don’t work very well with the differing voltage pattern of rechargeable CR123s.
Taurus Judge: Not For Self-Defense
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense on September 14th, 2009
The Taurus Judge is a revolver that can fire both .45 Long Colt cartridges and .410 gauge shotshells. This fine trick makes it a wonderfully versatile gun, perfect for certain jobs, but not for self-defense.
In one ad, Taurus shows two silhouette targets side-by-side. One has been punctured with six neat .45 holes. The other has a great gaping hole blasted into it by six .410 birdshot shells. “You Choose,” the ad suggests. And every time, I would grit my teeth and roll my eyes, until finally I couldn’t stand it anymore.
Birdshot is for birds. And maybe snakes. But not for larger predators like people. Oh, it’ll blow the hell out of a paper target, but birdshot has never penetrated particularly well on people, even when fired from a shotgun’s full-length barrel. Coming out of a tiny revolver barrel, the velocity, and therefore penetration, is dramatically reduced. The Box O’ Truth estimated that .410 birdshot penetration in flesh would be less than 2″. When fired into a plastic 2-liter cola bottle full of water, most of the shot didn’t even penetrate the back-side of the bottle. And when it comes to stopping an attack, penetration of the projectile to damage vital organs is key. Not that I’m volunteering to get shot by a Judge, but if someone was trying to kill me, I’d like a little more certainty. You shoot someone with 2″ of penetration, and maybe they will decide to stop attacking you. You get enough penetration to damage a major blood vessel or organ, and they will eventually stop whether they want to or not.
What about buckshot? You can get .410 shells loaded with 3 #00 balls. The Box O’ Truth found that these rounds would penetrate about 4.5″ in flesh, well short of the FBI’s desired 12″. Additionally, the rounds were squashed flat from pressing against each other in the barrel, which is not conducive to accuracy.
In fact, the only round that penetrated sufficiently from the Judge to be useful for defense was the .45 Long Colt. No surprise. There’s a reason that birdshot is shot (at birds) out of shotguns, buckshot out of shotguns, and bullets out of revolvers and pistols.
Buy a Judge if you want to, but don’t be fooled by Taurus’s marketing. .410 birdshot may blow the hell out of a piece of paper, but it’s not appropriate for self-defense.
The police are not here to protect you (specifically)
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Government and Law, Self-Defense on April 6th, 2009
True story. Names have been changed and gender pronouns have been androgenized because they really don’t matter. Recently, someone I know called the police let’s call this person Pat. Pat was calling the cops to report that s/he was concerned for hir safety. S/he believed that s/he might be in danger from a person who was known to own firearms.
The officer who answered the phone asked whether the threatening person was currently present. Pat said no. The officer then said that, it being a Friday night and all, their officers had higher priorities than this situation. “Are you kidding me,” Pat asked. “This person has been threatening me and harassing me, and now s/he said that s/he is coming over to my house. I know that s/he has a gun. That’s not a high enough priority for you?”
-
What I'm Doing Now- Oops! No Twitter!
