Posts Tagged firearms
Trigger Discipline
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Money and Marketing, Self-Defense on February 26th, 2010
Dear Everyone In TV, Movies, Modeling, Magazines, and Video Games:
If your character is not actually about to shoot something, for fuck’s sake, please do not pose them with their finger on the trigger. This is a heinous safety violation. Many of us who know about guns are TOTALLY UNABLE to enjoy your art or be influenced by your advertising because we are so damn distracted by the catastrophe that is about to happen.
Seriously. Spend a few minutes on a public firing range at 1:00 on a Saturday afternoon, when everybody and their cousin has come out to shoot for the first time ever, and after Little Billy accidentally points a (supposedly unloaded, but who can say for sure) gun at you two or three times, you too will hard-wire your brain to notice when people’s fingers are or are not on the trigger. You may also, as I did, resolve not to go to the range on Saturdays. When a person’s finger is on the trigger, and they are not firing at a safe target, all I can think of is getting their finger off the trigger, or leaving the area before they accidentally shoot me. This is probably not what you media people are intending.
You are also perpetuating bad habits. Why do you think Little Billy puts his finger on the trigger the second he picks up the gun? Because that’s what people on TV do. Har-de-har. It’s all funny until somebody gets shot in the foot.
Here is how you hold a gun, right up until the moment when the sights are on target and you are about to fire:
Where’s that finger? You got it.
Taurus Judge: Not For Self-Defense
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense on September 14th, 2009
The Taurus Judge is a revolver that can fire both .45 Long Colt cartridges and .410 gauge shotshells. This fine trick makes it a wonderfully versatile gun, perfect for certain jobs, but not for self-defense.
In one ad, Taurus shows two silhouette targets side-by-side. One has been punctured with six neat .45 holes. The other has a great gaping hole blasted into it by six .410 birdshot shells. “You Choose,” the ad suggests. And every time, I would grit my teeth and roll my eyes, until finally I couldn’t stand it anymore.
Birdshot is for birds. And maybe snakes. But not for larger predators like people. Oh, it’ll blow the hell out of a paper target, but birdshot has never penetrated particularly well on people, even when fired from a shotgun’s full-length barrel. Coming out of a tiny revolver barrel, the velocity, and therefore penetration, is dramatically reduced. The Box O’ Truth estimated that .410 birdshot penetration in flesh would be less than 2″. When fired into a plastic 2-liter cola bottle full of water, most of the shot didn’t even penetrate the back-side of the bottle. And when it comes to stopping an attack, penetration of the projectile to damage vital organs is key. Not that I’m volunteering to get shot by a Judge, but if someone was trying to kill me, I’d like a little more certainty. You shoot someone with 2″ of penetration, and maybe they will decide to stop attacking you. You get enough penetration to damage a major blood vessel or organ, and they will eventually stop whether they want to or not.
What about buckshot? You can get .410 shells loaded with 3 #00 balls. The Box O’ Truth found that these rounds would penetrate about 4.5″ in flesh, well short of the FBI’s desired 12″. Additionally, the rounds were squashed flat from pressing against each other in the barrel, which is not conducive to accuracy.
In fact, the only round that penetrated sufficiently from the Judge to be useful for defense was the .45 Long Colt. No surprise. There’s a reason that birdshot is shot (at birds) out of shotguns, buckshot out of shotguns, and bullets out of revolvers and pistols.
Buy a Judge if you want to, but don’t be fooled by Taurus’s marketing. .410 birdshot may blow the hell out of a piece of paper, but it’s not appropriate for self-defense.
Oleg Volk: Parental Responsibility
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense on August 28th, 2009
I love Oleg Volk (the creator of this photograph).
For more: http://www.a-human-right.com/introduction.html
Ammunition Cache; Stockpile of Guns
Posted by Joshua Bardwell in Self-Defense on August 24th, 2009
How many cartridges do you think it’s reasonable for a person to have? How many guns? At what point does it cross the line and become a “cache” or a “stockpile”?
People who are uncomfortable with guns may view owning even one as remarkable, but lots of people view guns as just another object, and we all know how people can accumulate objects. Some people plaster their walls with action-figures or collector’s plates. Other people collect guns. When a news story reports that a person had “a stockpile of fifty guns,” it’s intended to sensationalize. Absent of any evidence of malicious intent, I find it no more remarkable than if the person had a collection of Star Trek plates. Heck, at least guns are useful.
Buying a gun is kind of like getting at tattoo. Once you’ve got one, you often want to get another. I have no particular desire to “hoard” guns, and I’m not really a collector of anything, but every time I go into the range to shoot, I wander around the inventory, and I find myself thinking, “You know, I don’t have a lever action rifle yet!” That process will continue until I end up buying a lever-action, and then I’ll find myself thinking, “You know I don’t have a bolt-action distance-rifle yet!” Etc…
My point is that this behavior is completely normal and benign, and eventually it will result in me having a big, bad “stockpile” of guns. Keep that in mind when if you ever see me on the news being hauled out of my house in cuffs.
What about ammunition? I heard a great quote comparing a “cache” of thousands of rounds of ammo to the “cache” of thousands of grains of rice the person had in their pantry. It’s completely apt and I’m going to use it. When people hear that a person has 3,000, 5,000, 10,000 rounds of ammo, they tend to imagine one dead body for each round, and wonder what mass murder was going to be perpetrated. It’s just ignorance. Even conservatively, I shoot 100-200 rounds of pistol ammo every time I go to the range to practice. At that rate, I go through 1,000 rounds every 5-10 trips. Let’s just round up or down and call that a year’s worth of ammo. And I don’t shoot much at all compared to some competitive shooters, who might go through 500 to 1,000 rounds per practice session.
Okay, so say that 1,000 rounds is about a year’s worth of ammo. For one gun. Let’s say that I have a 9mm pistol (my carry gun), another pistol in .357 (because cowboy guns are beautiful historical artifacts), a rifle in 7.62×39mm (for medium game and home defense), a rifle in .22 (for cheap practice and small game), and a 12-gauge shotgun (for skeet-shooting, naturally, and home defense). Now, I could go out and buy ammo by the box for each of these guns, but it’s so much cheaper when you buy it by the case, and you see where I’m going. Five guns, five calibers, a thousand rounds here, a thousand rounds there, and voila. I’ve got a cache. A completely benign, harmless cache. Much like my cache of thousands of rice grains or beans.
Oh, and by the way, when the cops report that a person had thousands of rounds of ammo, they should be required to leave out .22. It’s not that .22 is harmless (although it’s certainly the least scary caliber a person could have), it’s just that .22 is so cheap (about 5 cents per round) that it’s common for people to have five or ten thousand rounds sitting around.
-
What I'm Doing Now- Oops! No Twitter!
