Archive for category Technology

Practicing For The Future, Looking To The Past

I recently had a conversation wherein I told a friend that I wasn’t interested in putting solar panels on my house. I think he was surprised, given that we had been having a discussion about ways that I reduce my home power usage. Sure, installing solar cells would further reduce my monthly electricity bill, but that’s not the goal of the game for me. Reducing energy consumption, ultimately, is about extending the period of time on which we depend on non-sustainable energy sources. I’m not particularly interested in that strategy, since it ultimately is destined to fail. Non-sustainable, by definition, means that eventually it runs out.

I don’t mean to suggest that I expect non-sustainable energy to fail within my lifetime, or, really, at any time in particular. It’s a given that it’ll run out, but the people who think they know when, and what will happen between now and then, are just guessing. What this means is that my actions align with my desires for the far-future in a necessarily vague sort of way. My individual actions will probably not significantly affect the course of humanity’s relationship with energy, nor am I likely to be precognitive enough to anticipate how I will relate to energy in the future, so all I can do is imagine how things might go and do what feels good today.

Putting solar panels on my roof doesn’t feel good today. Solar panels and batteries are, undeniably, The Future, and I am skeptical of the premise that the future will be delivered to us on the platter of ever-advancing technology. Derrick Jensen sums up my thoughts on technological “progress” towards the future in his essay High on Progress:

[W]e seem unquestioningly to presume that tomorrow’s progress will bring more good things to life, and will simultaneously solve the problems created by yesterday’s and today’s progress (without then creating yet more problems, as “progress” always seems to do).

Suggesting solar cells and batteries in order to address the problems caused by fossil fuel usage seems like a perfect example of that idea, and resisting that idea on principle seems more important than any good that might be wrought by the use of solar cells.

The problems caused by fossil fuel usage are fundamental to any non-sustainable energy source. Substituting another un-sustainable energy source for fossil fuels is unlikely to do much except postpone the ultimate reversion to sustainable sources. To those who associate “sustainable” with the Toyota Prius, a wind farm off the coast, and cold fusion reactors, “reversion” may seem like a funny word to combine with “sustainable.” They see sustainability in the future. But truly sustainable energy systems are still all around us, and always have been. A pasture is a perfectly sustainable solar cell. It will go on for millennia, growing grass and other plants for animals (perfectly sustainable “batteries”) to eat. Meanwhile, technology keeps “advancing.”

It’s not that I don’t understand technology’s allure. I’m a modern human, just like you are. I like driving a car, mowing my lawn, playing Xbox, and blogging on the Internet. I used to fret a lot about my own hypocrisy until it was pointed out to me that it’s not that I’m failing to live up to my own values, but that I have multiple values in play. I want to live sustainably, yes, but I also want to have a relationship with a community of friends, family, co-workers, and neighbors. I don’t want to spend my life in prison, have my home taken by the IRS, or starve myself to malnourishment. These are important priorities too, and the issue of sustainable living doesn’t trump them.

So I have a car, but I’m glad that I work out of the home so I don’t have to drive it very often. I have a mower, but I’m thinking about getting a sheep instead. I shop at the grocery store, but I have a garden that helps remind me where all that food in the grocery store really comes from. I have electricity to my home, but I use fans and careful opening and closing of windows instead of central air to regulate the house’s temperature. The balance of these priorities is less about how much energy I do or don’t use, and more about how dependent I am on external inputs for sustenance. From that perspective, solar cells are just another, extraordinarily technologically complex, external input.

Of course, I haven’t missed that those power lines leading up to my house represent one huge external input. The difference is this: if, one day, those power lines go dead, and the world has changed such that we no longer have electricity, I am ready to pick up my hand tools and go to work without it. That’s not to say that I am 100% ready, because to live that way today would mean giving up some of those other priorities that I also value, but I’m practicing. And from that perspective, putting solar cells on my roof is a waste of resources. I’d be better off buying more hand tools. Or a sheep.

  • Share/Bookmark

,

No Comments

Power Tools: Miter Saw

In response to my post about building a chest, Pauly asked, “I am considering making an investment in more power tools. What tools did you need to make it?” I thought that would be a good topic for a post.

Although the cordless drill and the circular saw are the bread-and-butter of my workshop, my miter saw and table saw are the flashy stars. Anything these tools do can be accomplished with cheaper hand tools, but there’s no denying that they dramatically add to speed, convenience, and precision when woodworking.

My miter saw is a DEWALT DW716 12-Inch Double-Bevel Compound Miter Saw. Now, there are those who say that a table saw is the first “big” power tool a woodworker should buy, but I get far more use out of my miter saw than my table saw. The reason is simple: my construction uses a lot of dimensional lumber, and so I end up doing a lot more cross-cutting than rip-cutting. And cross-cutting is what miter saws do best.

The bigger a miter saw, the larger the piece of lumber it can cut through. I bought a 12-inch saw because it could cut a 4×4 post at a 45-degree angle, and I figured a 4×4 would be the biggest thing I would reasonably need to cut. It can also cut a 2×10 board.

Miter saws really shine for applications like crown molding, where precise angles are important. Honestly, I never do stuff like that, and so this saw is really a little overkill. A bit of money could be saved by going down from a 12″ to a 10″ blade, and by going from double-bevel to single-bevel. This means that the saw would only tilt over sideways one direction, and you’d have to flip the lumber if you needed the bevel to go the other way.

Another variation is the sliding miter saw. This means that there is a set of rails, and after you drop the blade, you can slide it straight backwards about twelve inches. This dramatically increases your ability to cut through wide, flat boards, even with a 10″ blade, and means that a 12″ blade can cut pretty much anything you can imagine. The primary down-side of the sliding miter saw is cost: the sliding version of my saw costs $600 instead of $400 for the non-sliding version. A second down-side is that sliding saws need more clearance behind them, to make room for the sliding mechanism. This may be an issue if your workshop already has a built-in station for a non-sliding miter saw.

The major accessory I would recommend for a miter saw is a stand. Because miter saws are used primarily for cross-cuts, you’ve usually got a few feet of lumber hanging off the ends of the saw. That can make it damn near impossible to hold down against the fence. A miter saw stand has movable stops that support the ends of the lumber that hang off the saw’s work surface. You can buy one for about $200, but if you’ve got a little bit of initiative, you can build one for much cheaper. I prefer simply building the station into a counter-top, with the counter-top flush with the work-surface of the saw. This means that lumber laid on the counter-top is also perfectly positioned for cutting, and is supported along its entire length. You do give up portability, though.

  • Share/Bookmark

2 Comments

Power Tools: Drills

In response to my post about building a chest, Pauly asked, “I am considering making an investment in more power tools. What tools did you need to make it?” I thought that would be a good topic for a post.

If I had to pick just a few basic power tools, I would probably start with an electric circular saw and a battery-powered drill. In this post, I’ll discuss the drill.

When I wrote about circular saws, I recommended an electric one. For drills, I strongly prefer cordless. For whatever the reason, I have found 18v battery-powered drills to have more than enough power and endurance for my tasks. That, combined with the convenience of a cordless tool, mean that I’ve never wished I had a corded drill.

Drills are used for two things: driving screws and drilling holes. For driving screws, the most basic accessory that I use is a modular driver-head with sleeve. The driver-head has interchangeable bits that allow me to easily switch from flat-head to various sizes of phillips to hex-head, without loosening the drill’s chuck. The extended driver shaft makes it easier to get the drill into tight spaces. The sleeve makes it easy to get long screws started.

For drilling holes, I start with a set of bits in various sizes from 1/16″ up to 1/2″, such as Milwaukee 48-89-1105 1/16-to-1/2-Inch Titanium Coated Twist Drill Bit Assortment in Plastic Index, 20-Piece. I love that this set includes doubles of smaller bit-sizes, which are more likely to break. For boring holes of 3/8″ or larger through materials more than about 1/2″ deep, I prefer spade bits, as I find they are easier to handle and keep the hole neat.

For holes larger than 1/2″, of course, traditional drill bits aren’t really even an option, as they pretty much top out at that size. Here’s a decent set of spade bits: DeWalt DW1587 6 Bit 3/8-Inch to 1-Inch Spade Drill Bit Assortment.

Lastly, I have occasionally found a set of hole-saw bits to be useful. For one thing, they’re the easiest and fastest way to cut holes up to about 4″ in diameter. I started using mine when I was making self-watering planters and needed to cut a bunch of holes for 4″ PVC in the tops of plastic containers. I had been drawing the circles and cutting them with a jigsaw, which was slow and messy. When I switched to a hole saw, my life got a lot easier.

Shopping for hole saw sets can give a bit of sticker shock. Basically, a hole saw set consists of two mandrels (one for smaller saws and one for larger) and various sizes of saw. They easily run $50 to $100 depending on how many sizes of saw come with the set. The thing is, if you’ve got a specific project in mind, you can save a lot of money in the short term by buying a mandrel and the exact size of saw you need, but you will pay much more in the long run buying the saws individually compared to a set. For example, this set (Milwaukee 49-22-4095 Electricians Ice Hardened Hole Saw Kit, 10-Piece) has two mandrels and six blades between 7/8″ and 2 1/2″ and costs just under $50. By comparison, a single mandrel and a 3″ blade will run about $25, half the price of the six-piece set. In the end, it’s up to you, but I sucked it up and bought the six-piece set. I bought the 3.5″ blade that I needed separately, because it didn’t come with the set. At the time, I didn’t need any of the smaller blades, but I did need the mandrel. I’ve since used the smaller blades multiple times, and I came out way ahead compared to buying them individually when I needed them.

Oh, and let’s not forget that when you buy the hole saw blades in a set, you get a nice plastic carrying case for them. Now, if only I could figure out how to get the 3.5″ blade that I bought separately into that case. Hmm… maybe I’ll drill a hole in it.

There are lots of different types of drill bits out there, but those are the ones that I use. Actually, after my first big woodworking project, I bought one more set. In soft-wood, it’s a good idea to pre-drill screw and nail-holes, and in hardwood, it’s mandatory. For the best-looking projects, screw heads should be countersunk below the surface. Screws can simply be driven below the surface of soft-wood, but this sometimes results in stripping the screw and/or breaking off its head, which is a mess. I had this happen enough during the building of the chest that I ordered a set of countersink bits. These bits are pre-sized to drill pilot holes for common sizes of wood screw, and have an adjustable collet at the top that bores out a countersink hole at a pre-determined depth. This means that you can easily drill the pilot hole and countersink hole in one step.

Finally, here is one accessory for the drill that I have not yet bought, although I have been sorely tempted.

One of the most basic problems I have with a hand drill is getting it to go in perpendicular to the wood. This is, of course, what a drill press is good at, but you can’t always maneuver a piece under construction over to the drill press’s work surface. This drill guide attachment is designed to ensure that the hole is drilled at a precise and consistent angle. The only problem is that it’s $30 or so, and in addition to that, I’m not convinced that its utility would make up for its unwieldiness. I’m often drilling upside down or sideways into a piece of work that’s under construction, and it can be hard enough to maneuver the drill into place without having this big guide hanging off the front. Finally, reviews on the device and others like it are decidedly lukewarm.

In the next post, I’ll get to some of the real power tools: table saw and miter saw.

  • Share/Bookmark

1 Comment

Power Tools: Circular Saws

In response to my post about building a chest, Pauly asked, “I am considering making an investment in more power tools. What tools did you need to make it?” I thought that would be a good topic for a post.

If I had to pick just a few basic power tools, I would probably start with an electric circular saw and a battery-powered drill. In this post, I’ll discuss the circular saw.

The precision and speed of use with a circular saw is not the same as with a table saw and miter saw, but the value for the money is immense. You can get a good circular saw new in the $150-200 range, and used for half that, and be able to do almost any cut you would ever need. By comparison, a miter saw and table saw can easily run $200-300 each, and that’s for bottom-of-the-line models. Table saws especially can run into the thousands.

I would choose an electric saw because I have a little battery-powered one and it dies after, literally just a few cuts through a sheet of plywood. It is clearly under-powered for the job. I think it was intended more for cross-cuts on lumber and trim pieces. Speaking of power, don’t skimp. Cutting through big pieces of 3/4″ plywood takes a bit of “oomph,” and you don’t want the blade binding or the motor struggling.

The value of a circular saw is dramatically increased if you have a cutting guide. The problem with circular saws is that they don’t cut as straight a line as a table or miter saw. When doing long rip cuts, such as down the length of a board or across a sheet of plywood, a little bit of wandering off your line can add up to a lot of inaccuracy. When doing cross-cuts, it can be hard to get the end of the board exactly square.

For cross-cuts, I recommend a Speed Square. That link is to the 7″ version, but they come up to 12″ (and probably larger) if you need to cross-cut pieces of lumber bigger than 7″ wide. You place the lip of the square against the edge of the board and use the perpendicular edge of the square as a guide for the base-plate of your circular saw.  Above, you can see an illustration of this process. It’s really quick and much more accurate than trying to follow a marked line.

For the record, speed squares are actually very versatile and useful tools, that are much more than a straight-edge. Here’s a video describing more.

For rip-cuts, I recommend two different types of guides. If you’re doing a long rip-cut along the length of a board, such as cutting a 2×4 down to a pair of (approximate) 2x2s, or cutting strips of 1/8″ trim off of a piece of 1×4, I suggest a Rip Fence like the one shown below.

This device attaches to the baseplate of your circular saw and runs along the edge of the board, ensuring a straight cut… well, ensuring that the cut is as straight as the edge of the board, anyway. Rip fences like these may be custom-fit to a particular make or model of saw, and not all saws may accept them, so you should look into this before you buy.

For long cuts down sheet stock like plywood, I would choose a clamp-down cutting guide.This is, basically a straightedge between 4′ and 8′ long that you clamp to the sheet of plywood, and then you run your saw against it to make a straight cut. Not too complicated, right?

Now, this is a link to a clamp-down cutting guide that costs about $35, but I don’t recommend it and that’s why I’m not going to put in a picture. I just want you to see what NOT to buy. It’s not that there’s anything wrong with that particular device, it’s just that it costs $35 and you can easily make your own for much, much cheaper. Here are two links (1) (2) to online instructions.

These cutting guides can be as complicated as you want to make them, but I took the simple route. I bought a piece of 4′ long x 1″ square metal stock at the hardware store. This was about $10. The reason I used a metal bar was I wanted to be as sure as possible that my guide was a straight line, and a piece of wood might not accomplish that.

Then I took a left-over piece of 1/4″ thick plywood. I used self-tapping screws to screw the piece of plywood to the piece of metal stock so that one end of the plywood was flush with one edge of the stock. Then I ran the circular saw down the length of the plywood, with the baseplate pressed up against the metal guide bar. This addresses a problem with cutting guides, which is that you have to compensate for the distance between the edge of the baseplate and the blade when you set the guide in place. Putting on a larger piece of plywood and then cutting it off using the metal guide bar itself means that the edge of the plywood is exactly where the saw’s blade is going to cut. Now, when I want to line up a cut, I just place the edge of the plywood where the cut should go, place the saw’s baseplate against the metal guide, and cut. Piece of cake!

With a 4′ guide I can cut across the full width of a sheet of plywood. If I ever needed to cut the length of a sheet, I could easily make an 8′ guide, but I haven’t yet had to do that. For an 8′ guide, I probably would not buy metal bar stock. I probably would just cut off a piece of plywood and use the factory edge as the guide.

Incidentally, if you’re going to use a clamp-down guide, or if you’re going to do much carpentry at all, you’re going to need clamps. I recommend these as a starting point: Irwin Industrial 12-Inch Quick-Grip Bar Clamp with Bonus 6-Inch Mini Bar Clamp. These clamps are easy to tighten and release one-handed (trust me, this is essential) and they have a million and one other uses, whereas if you bought that purpose-built clamp-down guide, you wouldn’t have a set of clamps to use for anything else.

Next post: the power drill.

  • Share/Bookmark

2 Comments

Blackhawk Gladius

If my previous posts about tactical flashlights made you want one, you’re lucky that there are literally hundreds being made today. Mine is the Blackhawk Gladius. Like all tactical flashlights, the Gladius is very bright and very rugged. Here’s what I think sets it above the others.

The Gladius has three modes: momentary-on, constant-on, and flashing. Momentary-on turns on the light when you press the tailcap button and turns it off when you release the button. This is useful for a quick flash of light when you’re glancing at something in the dark. It’s also useful in combat, and especially gun-fighting, where constant light might give an attacker something to target.

Speaking of combat, the flashing setting is designed to disorient an opponent. I haven’t found it to be useful for day-to-day use. The flashing is rapid enough that, from the user’s end of the light, the strobing looks effectively similar to constant light. From the other end, the flashing is harder and slower to adapt to than a constant, bright light.

The constant-on mode turns the light on when you press the tailcap and off when you press the tailcap again. This is useful when you want the light on for extended time and don’t want to have to hold the button down the whole time. The constant-on mode has an additional useful feature in that it can be dimmed to preserve battery life (looking for your keys doesn’t require 200 lumens, you know) and to preserve night vision. Additionally, the flashlight can be set so that the constant-on mode comes on at full brightness, at minimum brightness, or at the previously-set brightness level. I have mine set to come on at the dimmest setting. If I want a utility light, I turn it on in the continuous mode and know I won’t blast myself with bright light. When I need maximum light, I switch to momentary mode, or just turn on in continuous mode (at the dimmest setting) and hold the button down to cause the flashlight to ramp up to full brightness.

This might sound a bit complicated, but the flashlight is very well designed. There is a ring around the tailcap button that is used to select between the light’s three modes. The first position is constant-on, the second is strobe, the third is momentary-on. The dial turns easily with one hand, and switching between modes quickly becomes second nature.

Speaking of ergonomics, I’ve held tactical flashlights whose tailcap button was quite stiff. I suppose this keeps the light from being activated accidentally, but it means that your thumb gets quite a workout when using the flashlight in momentary-on mode. The Gladius has a lock-out position on the rotary dial to prevent accidental activation of the light and easy-to-press tailcap button.

A final nifty feature of the Gladius is its power management circuitry. The light moderates the current to the LED bulb to keep light output stable as the battery gets weaker. When the battery is getting low, the light blinks once every fifteen seconds to indicate that you should change the batteries soon, but the light continues to operate at full output right up until the moment the batteries totally crap out. What this means is that you’ve always got a heads-up that your batteries are getting low, but as long as there is any battery left at all, the light is fully usable. Actually, it’s not quite fully usable. When the batteries are low, the constant-on mode is disabled. The idea here is that you are no longer able to use the light in its most utilitarian mode, but if you need full brightness for something important, you’ve still got it. The same power management circuitry monitors the LED’s temperature and reduces light output if the LED gets too hot. Overheating the LED is one of the ways that these flashlights can be damaged. For the record, I’ve never had this happen. I imagine that it must happen when the light is used continuously and/or in a very hot environment.

Some reasons people might choose another flashlight over the Gladius include: It’s not the absolute brightest light out there, for those who are into the numbers game. It doesn’t have built-in rechargeable batteries. Sure, you could buy rechargeable CR123 cells, but their performance is hit-or-miss in many tactical flashlights. And, of course, there’s the cost. $150-$170 depending on where you buy it. It does not come with a strike bezel, so for those for whom a strike bezel is an absolute must, this flashlight is out. Finally, it only comes in one color of light: white. People who want a red (for night vision) or blue (for tracking an animals blood trail) light will have to either buy gels to put over the light’s standard 1.25″ bezel or choose a different flashlight with colored LEDs built in.

A last word: The Gladius is not designed first and foremost as a weapon light, but it is rugged enough to be mounted on a firearm without damaging it, and its 1″ diameter body fits into a standard set of scope rings, for attachment to an accessory rail.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments