Archive for category Government and Law

“Hey Kid! The First One’s Free!”

Hey D.A.R.E.? Who’s the pusher now?

In case you don’t know, Nuvigil is more-or-less amphetamine.

 

 

Share

1 Comment

USA Today’s Propaganda

It’s been a while since I served up a frothing mug of culturally-induced bile; it’s's been a while since I went on a business trip too. The two are definitely related. The more time I spend exposing myself to the Voice Of My Culture (media), the more I find to comment on. Business trips are good for blogging, but bad for my sanity.

Case in point: this article from USA Today:

The sub-heading was what really caught my eye and made me sputter: “Purposely put at risk by insurgents.” Am I to infer that the author of this article has entered the mind of the “insurgents,” Being John Malkovich-style, and determined that the civilian casualties were purposeful? Of course not. So what’s the source for this statement? Unlike most cases where a newspaper trumpets a piece of government propaganda, the source of the message is explicitly acknowledged in this very article. Colonel Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman, is quoted as saying, “The enemy put civilians purposely at great risk by its tactics and actions.” Well, shit. A Pentagon spokesperson got to write the sub-heading of your article. Now there’s an unbiased source if ever I heard one. Good journalism, USA Today!

Of course, the U.S. has also caused civilian casualties, but presumably those were not “purposeful.” Or, perhaps it would be more accurate to say, “tautologically those were not purposeful.” When the U.S. military causes civilian death, the American media assumes that reasonable efforts were taken to avoid that outcome. “Our” enemies are not afforded the same courtesy.

How much does the U.S. military actually care about avoiding civilian casualties? The answer, once again, is right here in this very article! From the invasion in 2003 to 2007, four years, the U.S. cared so much about civilian casualties that they, “did not show much interest in tracking [them]…. It didn’t see population protection as central to the mission or our core responsibility.” Who’s purposely putting civilians at risk again?

It disgusts me that this type of propaganda is passed off as reporting.

Share

,

No Comments

Memorial Day Thoughts

My blog reader today is full of people thanking the troops. Call me a cynic, but any validity that the sentiment has for me is dulled by the feeling that I’m not getting both sides of the story.

How does one even begin to honor and thank those that are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country…my country.

Let’s start with the idea that this is “my country” and these are “my troops.” This language of unification stifles dissent by making us internalize the idea that we are each individually morally responsible for the actions of our elected officials, even if we disagree with those actions. If this is “my country” and these are “my troops,” then I have to overcome significant cognitive dissonance in order to believe that the things they are doing are morally wrong.

How do you show sufficient gratitude to those that protect my family… all the while being away from theirs?

Are they protecting your family? From what? Only in the most vague and indirect sense are the military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan protecting us from a foreign threat. The more I examine the political and military history of the U.S., the more I conclude that our military actions have historically been just as much, if not more, about securing foreign resources and economic interests for the U.S., as they have been about protecting us from a foreign threat. This is not conjecture. History is full of quotes from politicians and business-people drooling over the natural resources they’ll have access to once a certain military action is complete.

How can I possibly say thanks to those that have actually laid down their lives for me and my children… while leaving their children without a father or mother?

Did they lay down their lives “for me”? I didn’t send them to war. I say, “bring them home!” I say, “I don’t support the things you are dying for, and would like you to get the hell out of harm’s way so you can stop dying!” But the way our political system works is that the voice of those who disagree is ignored, and they are still held morally responsible for the actions of those in power. And if I say, “They didn’t die for me,” I’m branded a traitor and a subversive.

Are there words big enough to convey the deep and abiding respect I have for our military men and women?

Probably not.

But in my own simple and humble way I just want to say…

Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

I’m thankful to those who sacrifice for me, but I’m scornful of those who send others to sacrifice for their own economic and political ends, and then who tell me it’s all for my own good. This Memorial Day, I will pay my respect to the military personnel who died for a noble cause, if you can find me one. Otherwise, I will mourn for those who died in service of a lie: that they were proud warriors protecting their country from evil, when in fact, they were proud warriors, being sent to die in the service of the all-mighty GDP.

Share

2 Comments

Hippy Bullshit

http://vermontreview.tripod.com/Interviews/devo.htm

VR: Going back to your early days. You were present at the Kent State shootings in 1970. How did that day affect you?

JC: Whatever I would say, would probably not all touch upon the significance or gravity of the situation at this point of time? It may sound trite or glib. All I can tell you is that it completely and utterly changed my life. I was white hippie boy and than I saw exit wounds from M1 rifles out of the backs of two people I knew. Two of the four people who were killed, Jeffrey Miller and Allison Krause, were my friends. We were all running our asses off from these motherf&*$#ers. It was total utter bullshit. Live ammunition and gasmasks – none of us knew, none of us could have imagined. They shot into a crowd that was running. I stopped being a hippie and I started to develop the idea of devolution. I got real, real pissed off.

VR: You said that the Kent State shooting sort of served as a catalyst for your theory of Devolution, which spawned Devo.

JC: Absolutely. Until then I was a hippie. I thought that the world is essentially good. If people were evil, there was justice and that the law mattered. All of those silly naïve things. I saw the depths of the horrors and lies and the evil. In the paper that evening, the Akron Beacon Journal, said that students were running around armed and that officers had been hurt. So deputy sheriffs went out and deputized citizens. They drove around with shotguns and there was martial law for ten days. 7 PM curfew. It was open season the students. We lived in fear. Helicopters surrounding the city with hourly rotating runs out to the West Side and back downtown. All first amendment rights are suspended at the instance when the governor gives the order. All of the class action suits by the parents of the slain students were all dismissed out of court because once the governor announced martial law, they had no right to assemble.

I can really identify with the experience he’s describing. The older I get, the harder it is to believe that the world is essentially good, and that there is justice in it. I feel naive and gullible for buying into that myth, which I am coming to think is propagated by those who defy it, to keep those of us who buy into it docile.

Share

8 Comments

DJ AM Toxicology Test Results

Toronto Sun reports:

NEW YORK — DJ AM died accidentally from a lethal cocktail of prescription drugs and cocaine, the medical examiner’s office ruled Tuesday.

The toxicology report showed the 36-year-old had in his system cocaine, OxyContin, Hydrocodone or Vicodin, antianxiety drugs Xanax and Ativan, Klonopin which also controls anger, Benadryl, and Levamisole, a drug apparently used to cut cocaine.

Now, that’s a hell of a lot of drugs to have in your system at one time, I don’t care who you are, but the one that jumped out at me was the levamisole. I remembered reading about it a while back, but couldn’t remember why it was dangerous. From the AP:

The medication called levamisole … can be used in humans to treat colorectal cancer, but it severely weakens the body’s immune system, leaving patients vulnerable to fatal infections.

Scientific studies suggest levamisole might give cocaine a more intense high, possibly by increasing levels of dopamine, the brain’s “feel-good” neurotransmitters.

Interesting. Gives the user a yummy dopamine rush, but also makes them susceptible to fatal infections. According to the article, levamisole is supposedly being cut in before importation, so it’s hard for users, or even dealers, to know whether their stuff has been cut with it.

Now, let’s consider when something like this happens with a legal good. Remember the melamine in baby-food imported from China? What about diethylene glycol in toothpaste? What about good old yummy lead paint? With legal goods, a regulatory or overseeing body detects the tainted product, blocks the importation, and notifies consumers which products should be avoided. The supplier could smuggle the product in, but that would dramatically increase the price, and anyway, everybody knows their stuff is tainted, so nobody would want it. In most cases, the supplier chooses to remove the offending toxin because importing stuff legally is much cheaper and easier than importing stuff illegally.

On the black market, of course, different forces apply. A black-market supply chain is necessarily long, convoluted, and opaque. There’s no way to tell where the stuff you’re getting came from. There’s no way to tell if it’s tainted, and if you do find out that it’s tainted there’s no way to tell whether any other batch is any better. Given how expensive, risky, and difficult-to-acquire prohibition makes drugs, you’re more likely to take your chances even if you do know the stuff is tainted. Given these conditions, producers can hardly be held accountable for cutting their products with toxic chemicals. There is a strong motivation to use adulterants, even if they have medium or long-term health effects.

As usual, The Man takes the wrong message home from this situation:

The tainted cocaine has received only limited attention in the U.S., though federal authorities are monitoring its use, said Paul Knierim, a DEA spokesman in Washington.

“I think the message is the same: Don’t use cocaine, it’s a dangerous drug,” Knierim said.

Well, actually, it sounds to me like levamisole is the dangerous drug. Nobody looked at the Chinese baby food, tooth paste, or lead-painted toys and concluded that baby food, tooth paste, and toys were dangerous. What makes cocaine particularly dangerous is the system of prohibition that encourages producers to taint it and prevents regulatory bodies from quickly detecting the contamination, containing it, and notifying the public.

Share

, ,

1 Comment